The first thing I noticed when listening to this poem is that the reader selects very precises dates ('May 1984'), which I think is a good technique as it gives the events and feelings expressed in the poem a sense of reality, as if they really happened and had an impact on the reader. Archive footage of war is also used, which creates quite a saddening effect as, with the poem being read at the same time, a grim, upsetting picture been painted by putting the theme of conflict into context. He refers to Leeds F.C. a number of times, possibly to give a reader (especially if they are from this region) something to relate to, effectively matching his words with more context (cultural this time).
It is interesting that he mentions the word 'united' as I find this word splits into two recurring themes in the poem. The first of these themes is conflict, which I mentioned above. He constantly mentions the skinhead gangs wrecking havoc amongst the city, they graffiti vulgar language on the gravestones of the dead, amongst other areas in the city. I find the use of strong language to be engaging, as it shows just how much of a vulgar reality has been created by the skinhead population. The word 'united' also lends itself to the context of actually being united. I think is evident when the clips of the gravestones are used, displaying the author's family all in the same grave. It is as if they are 'united'.
When the skinhead population are on their vandalizing spree, he mentions that their violence and graffiti is 'all over Leeds' as if it is dominating. They are displaying their 'art' all over town for people to see, but I find interesting is that he mentions that they don't sign it. Is this so that they can hide? Is there something that they don't want people to know about? the author even goes as far to ask the question "Why don't you sign?". However, the author then reveals that the skinhead didn't sign it because it was him. He simply asking himself this question, which is very interesting as a new theme has been introduced - the idea of 'self vs. self'. He reveals that he too was skinhead who used strong language effectively, but because of his educational background, he knows that he is in control of his anger, unlike the other, uneducated skinheads, where violent behavior will always be part of their daily routine.
I found this pen to be a very emotional and powerful one. This because after hearing it, I cannot help but question, are there ever lasting rivalries that last throughout life? is there always competition? The author makes it clear that there is arrogance inside all of us, but it is an education that gives us the definitive control as to how we display our emotions.
No comments:
Post a Comment